Submitted in application for the

 

Workshop on Faculty Development – Math/Computer Science

 

May 22-27, 2003

 

 

 

Ileana Ionascu

 

 

 

 

My background, as a mathematician, is in pure mathematics, more precisely Functional Analysis.  I did my undergraduate and MS degrees in Bucharest, Romania, before the fall of communism.  Those were hard times for Eastern Europe.  Nevertheless, the educational system was one of the strong points, one of the few factors that kept the society alive.  I, myself, was also lucky enough to have especially very good math teachers, both in elementary school and in high school.  So that by the 11th grade I was already decided about my career: I would study mathematics, specialize in some branch of analysis, and do research for the rest of my life!  This seemed to be a good choice, best fit not only for my analytic mind and shy personality, but for the specific situation in Romania of those years. We were all trying to escape from reality in some way: art, family life, small groups of friends, risky political jokes, and sometimes… careers that seemed to have nothing to do with real life!  Together with my colleagues, I used to think that mathematics was offering us the freedom we didn’t have at that time.  

 

But one fact, thought of as a useless hardship at the moment, changed my views drastically.  After earning my MS, as a condition of starting employment with a prestigious research institute, I had to teach math, for two years, in a high school of the state’s choice. Those years I taught math to students that were all academically unprepared, many lacked education and some had no clear moral values.  I will not describe my disappointment, frustration, anger, revolt, and then again frustration…  What amazed me at the time was: I really enjoyed teaching those children!

 

There, in that high school at the bottom of the system, I learned that teaching, in general, and teaching math, even math, as separated from reality as I considered it, can be a powerful tool of impact on young people’s life.   For some, few I hope, this sense of power seems to develop into tyranny, a way of serving their thirst for domination.  For me, as for most people who find themselves in this position, to share all I knew and was useful to them seemed to be the only way.   

 

At the same time, I started to accept that math was not as separated from reality as I thought I wanted it to be! My students were responding better to associations of math with things they were experiencing directly every day: from fractions as portions of a monetary unit, to geometric shapes representing household objects and to mathematical relationships compared to physical interactions in nature.   Math came into being by creating abstract ideas from objects, shapes, facts from real life, and it is all so natural that, at some level, we use this connection for pedagogical purpose. 

 

The even more important connection between teaching (in general, and math in its own way) and life is the opportunity of educating at the same time as instructing.  By “instruction”, I mean the mere effective transmission of knowledge and technical skills.  Young as I was when I was a high school teacher, somehow I was able to share with my students some of my moral, ethical and philosophical views.  Especially for those groups of disadvantaged children, it seemed to make a big difference. 

 

It also made a big difference for me!  Among other things, it gave me the courage to leave my native Romania and come to the United States to work on my doctorate!  My teaching philosophy made me adapt very easily to a new educational environment.   Over the years, I accumulated a lot more experience: as a PhD student, a postdoctoral fellow, a visiting faculty, and even more since I came to Houston Baptist University.  I learned some from my colleagues, and I learned some from my students.  Nevertheless, my original intuitive understanding of teaching math “in the context” and “with a wider purpose” is still a guiding principle in my professional life. 

 

Since I started teaching at Houston Baptist University as an assistant professor of mathematics, I had the opportunity to teach a variety of classes, from the lowest level to the highest we have in our BS program.   One reason for my choice of HBU was that, it being a Christian university, my efforts to educate my students in the spirit of Judeo–Christian values were to be more appreciated. 

 

I want to make myself clear about the way I approach this matter.  Most of the time, with all students, I try to “teach by example”.  As Jesus showed us, people are more tempted to follow what you do than what you say. I consider very important the way we conduct ourselves in front of our students as educators, with other instructors, as colleagues, and in society in general as citizens.  I also try to “sneak in”, when appropriate, an anecdote or joke that is related to our class subject, but is also of some general educational benefit.  If I had to explain the reason for why this method seems to work, I’d say because young people more than older adults are very sensitive to details and some are somehow reluctant to “obey the imposed rule”.   

 

A more organized approach I take in some lower level classes, like Finite Math (required of Business students) and especially in Mathematics for Critical Thinking.  This last class was designed to satisfy the mathematics part of the general education requirements for our undergraduates.  It is an alternative to College Algebra and it was planned to be specifically useful for people who would benefit more from the analytic mind set provided by the rigorous exercise of logic than from trying to struggle, one more time, with formulas they never liked, nor understood, nor will they ever need. 

 

I want to talk about this class because it turned out to give me the biggest pedagogical satisfaction yet.   The way the material is selected (logic, set theory, combinatorics probability and statistics & mathematics of finance), one can cover topics of interest even for the non-mathematically inclined and it provides at the same time the opportunity to open students’ minds to critical, analytic thinking, to show them the connections of math with real life, to break the almost-hatred of math they had been harboring (since the 6th grade!), and, finally, to exercise their newly acquired talent to “do math” – a terrifying subject nit long ago! -  and do it with some pleasure!                 

 

This coming Spring quarter, I will teach again (for the fifth time) Math for Critical Thinking.  I am especially interested in studying better ways (style, methods, subjects) to make this class even more enjoyable, more useful, and fitting in with the mission of our university to “prepare students for meaningful lives and work, and for the service to God and all the people of the world”.

 

I hope that, by the time the workshop meets, I will be able to report on my progress concerning this class.  Another project that could yield some ideas worth reporting is teaching Introduction to Math Concepts, this spring, as well, for the first time in our department.  Yet another matter that I am concerned with is the preparation of future math teachers.  I am just finishing now a senior seminar for math education majors and I intend to assess the results.