-
Scripture (and?) Tradition
-
- I. Preliminaries
- paradosis: "passing on" (1 Cor. 15:3ff), "traditions" (2 Thess. 2:15)
- Tradition is both the process of transmission, and what is transmitted
- Distinctions from WCC Faith and Order, 1963:
-
- Tradition = the content of what is transmitted
-
- tradition = the process of transmission
-
- traditions = the inheritance of separate churches or movements
- Defined this way, Scripture is included in all three
- All are works of the Holy Spirit in mediating Jesus Christ
-
- II. If Scripture Is Tradition, Then is Tradition Scripture?
- Christian practices seek to be biblical (Nicene Creed, sacraments, worship)
- Christian traditions disagree over whether Tradition is no more than Scripture
- Inerrancy means that the Bible norms all traditions (including itself)
-
- III. Eastern Orthodoxy: Tradition Is Scripture
- In tradition, the Spirit makes Scripture real in the Church (Dimutru Staniloae)
- tradition amplifies and deepens Scripture into Holy Tradition / traditions
- Holy Tradition cannot fail, by definition; no sin in the true Church
- Summary: Orthodox appreciate the continuity of tradition
- Problem: No theological account of when Tradition does fail
-
- IV. Protestantism: Is Tradition Scripture?
- Thirty-Nine Articles: Tradition and traditions must be judged by Scripture
- tradition norms them under Scripture to become Holy Tradition
- Scripture is the norma normans, Tradition the norma normata
- Sola Scriptura: The Word stands over, relativizing and empowering traditions
- Must Scripture cause Tradition, or merely norm it?
-
- Radical Reformation and Calvinism: Yes; thus the Church is primitivist
-
-
- (thus the priesthood of all believers)
-
- Lutheranism, Anglicanism, Methodism: No; adiaphora can be retained
-
-
- (thus priesthood of all believers, but ordained priests/ministers)
- Either way, Tradition's authority is temporary
- Summary: Protestants appreciate the sufficiency of Scripture
- Problem: Is this position stable if Scripture itself is Tradition?
-
- V. Roman Catholicism: Is Tradition More Than Scripture?
- Unlike Orthodox, Catholics address "the problem of distorting tradition"
- Three attitudes towards Tradition at the time of the Reformation:
-
- 1. Classical: All saving truth is explicitly or implicitly in Scripture
-
-
- Scripture is formally insufficient, but materially sufficient
-
- 2. Two-source: "Partly in written books and partly in unwritten Tradition"
-
- 3. Charismatic: New illumination through popes and councils
- Trent and Vatican II refuse to choose one option
- Today Catholics emphasize tradition over Tradition, favor the classical view
- The teaching office: Magisterium traditions Scripture, under its authority
- The Spirit develops traditions (such as doctrines) from Scripture
- Summary: Catholics appreciate the dynamic continuity of Tradition
- Problem: Neither Magisterium nor two-source traditions can be critiqued
-
- VI. Conclusion: Tradition Is Eschatology
- Each vision becomes a self-fulfilling model; we see what we expect to find
- Each vision relatively lacks what the others appreciate
- Each vision reflects a distinct eschatology:
-
- Eastern Orthodoxy reflects "realized eschatology"
-
- Magisterial Protestantism reflects "futurist eschatology"
-
- Radical Protestantism reflects "dialectical eschatology"
-
- Roman Catholicism reflects "inaugurated eschatology"
- All four have their precedent in Scripture