Matthew's version of the Lord's Prayer (Matt. 6:9-13) reads:
(9) "Pray then in this way: 'Our Father in heaven, let your name be held holy. (10) Let your kingdom come, let your will be done, as in heaven so on earth. (11) Give us today our daily bread. (12) And forgive us our debts, as we have forgiven our debtors. (13) And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one.'"
Christological (and Trinitarian) doctrines describe the identity of Jesus Christ. A different doctrine implies that Jesus has a different identity. If a doctrine alters Jesus' identity, how does that alter the prayer's meaning?
Show how two Christological and/or Trinitarian heresies from Christian history (that is, two fundamentally defective accounts of Jesus relating to his humanity, divinity, personhood, and/or relations with the Father and the Spirit) alter in specific ways the meaning of specific parts of the Lord's Prayer. What do they come to mean when God or Jesus Christ are understood in these heretical ways?
Focus on specific phrases of the prayer. Draw from the heresies described in lectures, and secondary readings and draw on these resources to make your points. I expect to see the relevant readings represented in your answer, not just regurgitated details from my lectures.
In conclusion, do you consider each such alteration such a fundamental distortion that the Church has been right to reject that teaching as heretical? Why or why not?
You can read a sample of the way I myself would begin to answer this question in, well, my book on the Lord's Prayer. Remember, I want to see proper style, clear writing, a thorough answer to the question, and explicit citations of course materials.
(Back to Schedule)